Oh! Oh! Oh! :-)

Posted by Thillai (61.17.181.212) on January 24, 2006 at 04:30:23:

In Reply to: Crass article! posted by Vidya on January 23, 2006 at 18:45:38:

Dear Vidya, I think what matters is that Anita was honest (bad American influence?), and right in about 95% of what she wrote, including what she wrote about Shobana. And Malavika Sarukkai now is as good as Anita. All in all, they are all far from perfect.

I belive that Anita is right to think that she is not in the same league as Padma Subrahmanyam: I feel that Anita is BETTER. Padma USED TO BE good. Now, I am sorry to say that, she looks like a scare crow or a clown in most of her "dance". NOW, due to the lack of practice, Padma can only be considered as a guru. SheSelf-taught guru, that is, who learned most of the karanas by doing "a research" that every child can do.

Of course, we all have certain weaknesses. I think that Anita's "gripe with Priyadarshini is that Priya" is simply about the fact that Priya recently managed to produce so many well-selling DVDs while Anita so far has got only 1, and it appears that Priya's technique may be better received by a larger audience. That's all. We are all human beings. So what? Big deal!